Replacement Sails

A forum for discussing topics relating to MacGregor Powersailor Sailboats
User avatar
Wet_Feet
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:29 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by Wet_Feet »

Judy, thanks so much your feed back, it is great to hear from someone that really knows their stuff....as I believe you do.
Judy B wrote: BWY is highly respected for their honesty and good customer service. I sincerely believe they would never,ever intentionally or knowingly misrepresent their product. I really, really think there's been a verbal miscommunication between you and BWY.

Their website says 5.0 oz dacron and 5.5 oz dacron.
Their website doesn't mention "High Modulus" anywhere.
In fact, their website doesn't even mention Challenge anywhere.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 5 OZ OR 5.5 OZ CHALLENGE HIGH MODULUS CLOTH.

Challenge 5.53 has 250 x 300 dernier threads in the weave. It does not weigh 5.53 oz
Challenge 6.03 has 250 x 400 dernier threads in the weave. It does not weigh 6.03 oz
They both weigh exactly the same. 6 oz.
The difference in thread diameter are offset by threads per inch and density of weave, to arrive at the final weight.
Sorry Judy, I should have mentioned I had emailed them and that is where I received my information. It took me three attempts to post the reply so it became more abbreviated each time...I know it's hard to believe that was the abbreviated version.
bwytodd wrote:Sorry, I should add for clarity, what we refer to as HIgh Modulus 5 and 5.5 OZ are really 4.93 and 5.53, I guess rounding for simplicity actually caused more confusion than it eliminated! Also, many of you who have commented that Doyle sails that you have purchased from us over the years do not appear to use this high quality cloth are correct, the older sails were the straight factory sails, the new sails are totally different and greatly improved.
Thanks Todd for clarifying. Good to know also that there isn't much point in asking for reviews if these sails are new for 2015.

Judy, your website advises you use Challenge 6.03 Low Aspect, High Modulus Dacron on your 120X jib sail but I don't see this product on the Challenge Sailcloth Website.
http://www.challengesailcloth.com/highmodulus/

When they refer to Low Aspect or High Aspect, I'm assuming they are referring to the sail design? On an airplane, a wing with a high aspect ratio is long and skinny, such as a glider wing. Same thing with boat sails? Also, what are AP-1, AP-2, AP-3 sails they refer to in their general usage chart? Would this be like an All Purpose #1 - 3 Jib? They also refer to LT-1, MD-1, MD-2, HV-1....I'm guessing Light Med & heavy, does this refer to suitable wind speeds that I'm guessing would be utilized in this fashion more in a race environment? I realize these tables are probably a VERY loose guide.

The more I learn, the less I realize I know.

Cheers,

John
bwytodd
Deckhand
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:25 pm

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by bwytodd »

As many of you have noted, sail cloth weights are not ever exact to the published weights, but give a rough estimate of the actual weight. Cloth manufacturers have to differentiate between their various products in some way without getting so technical that it confuses people. It often happens that a cloth is designed to "perform like" it is a certain weight but really doesn't weigh that exact amount. With the Challenge cloth, many of their products use nomenclature that describes their weight to the hundredth of an ounce, this lets them create a "part number" as much as anything else, manufacturing tolerances will cause variations greater than .01 OZ in the cloth.

AS to high aspect and low aspect, it is referring to cloth designs that are optimized for different sail designs. Tall narrow sails have very different load patterns than shorter wider sails.
bwytodd
Deckhand
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:25 pm

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by bwytodd »

Shipping to Canada.

Someone had a question on shipping cost to Canada, At BWY our typical ground shipping cost is about $30, obviously considerably more if you need express service.
User avatar
vkmaynard
Admiral
Posts: 1011
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:02 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Apex, NC - 2001 26X "Compromise" w/ 2010 Suzuki DF90A
Contact:

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by vkmaynard »

FYI: Not taking credit for the larger jib idea. Billy (XX) and I discussed this many time over that last years. We think that if this worked it would make the boat a lot more usable for making sailing distance in all situations.

Victor
User avatar
Highlander
Admiral
Posts: 5995
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:25 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Maccutter26M 2008 75HP Merc. 4/S Victoria BC. Can. ' An Hileanto'ir III '
Contact:

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by Highlander »

Hey Victor, it sounds like you've done your research but thought I would pass along a note a saw on the BWY website....

"130% or 135% Genoas simply do not work well on any of these boats because the mast shrouds are attached all the way out at the hull. The wide shroud base makes it impossible to properly sheet these in between sized sails for proper upwind sailing. On all Macgregor and Venture models (as well as a lot of other boats) these sails really don't do anything well. They must be sheeted outside the mast shrouds so they aren't easy to tack, but unlike the 150% Genoa, these sails do not extend far enough past the shrouds to wrap around them, so they are VERY limited in their ability to sail close to the wind. With a 150% Genoa, the shrouds fall into the "pocket" of the sail so you can pull the sail in much closer. While you will get a little more power reaching and downwind than a 100% Jib, it's not enough to make up for the disadvantages."

Perhaps you've got something figured out? I'm pretty new to this sailing Gig but I'm assuming that when you reef a 150 Genny you have to relocate the sheets to the forward sheet rail (same place as they would be for a jib), and this is where you are getting the "Wet Diaper" Sail?

This is very easy too remedy I have done it
First if u want to go with a 130-135 jib make a small but strong retractable or folding & removable bowsprit I,m guessing anywhere from 24-30" long I have designed & made several diff ones for the mac,s
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee20 ... 010006.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 52ab25.jpg

the banana bowsprit is removable & very easy to make urself
http://www.forespar.com/products/sail-b ... prit.shtml

installing jib track on the cabin roof is not that difficult a little time consuming thats all I,ve done it
http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010012.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010011.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010009.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010008.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010007.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010018.jpg

These r 7 ft genny tracks I believe I,d have to check but mod will solve ur problem & bring ur sheets inside the shrouds

Hope this gives u guy,s some idea,s

J 8)
User avatar
Judy B
First Officer
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:37 pm
Sailboat: Other
Location: San Francisco Bay area and any where my hybrid SUV can tow my boat
Contact:

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by Judy B »

Highlander wrote:Hey Victor, it sounds like you've done your research but thought I would pass along a note a saw on the BWY website....

"130% or 135% Genoas simply do not work well on any of these boats because the mast shrouds are attached all the way out at the hull. The wide shroud base makes it impossible to properly sheet these in between sized sails for proper upwind sailing. On all Macgregor and Venture models (as well as a lot of other boats) these sails really don't do anything well. They must be sheeted outside the mast shrouds so they aren't easy to tack, but unlike the 150% Genoa, these sails do not extend far enough past the shrouds to wrap around them, so they are VERY limited in their ability to sail close to the wind. With a 150% Genoa, the shrouds fall into the "pocket" of the sail so you can pull the sail in much closer. While you will get a little more power reaching and downwind than a 100% Jib, it's not enough to make up for the disadvantages."

Perhaps you've got something figured out? I'm pretty new to this sailing Gig but I'm assuming that when you reef a 150 Genny you have to relocate the sheets to the forward sheet rail (same place as they would be for a jib), and this is where you are getting the "Wet Diaper" Sail?

This is very easy too remedy I have done it
First if u want to go with a 130-135 jib make a small but strong retractable or folding & removable bowsprit I,m guessing anywhere from 24-30" long I have designed & made several diff ones for the mac,s
http://i235.photobucket.com/albums/ee20 ... 010006.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 52ab25.jpg

the banana bowsprit is removable & very easy to make urself
http://www.forespar.com/products/sail-b ... prit.shtml

installing jib track on the cabin roof is not that difficult a little time consuming thats all I,ve done it
http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010012.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010011.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010009.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010008.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010007.jpg

http://i844.photobucket.com/albums/ab1/ ... 010018.jpg

These r 7 ft genny tracks I believe I,d have to check but mod will solve ur problem & bring ur sheets inside the shrouds

Hope this gives u guy,s some idea,s

J 8)
A quick reply, because I don't have time for a long one:

You usually can't sheet a 135% inside the shrouds on any boat. The leech would hit the lower diagonal shroud. In general, for a rig with swept spreaders, the biggest sail that will sheet inside the shrouds is approx 105%. On a rig with swept spreaders, the biggest jib that will sheet inside the shrouds would be approx 105%.

Many, many boats have 135% genoas. It's the most popular sail for cruisers. I sell more 130-135% genoas than any other size. Every 135% genoa Iv'e ever sold has sheeted outside the shrouds.... and 135's work just fine for upwind work. Sometimes better than 150% genoas.

The biggest obstacle to putting a 135-ish sail on the Mac26X is that there aren't any tracks or jib leads in a the right place. I repeat: The shrouds and chainplate locations aren't the big problem. The lack of of tracks is the big problem.

You could conceivably solve the problem with barber haulers. or perhaps with clever track placement. Victor is working on that and Highlander has done some amazing things with his boat, so maybe he has some ideas.

Cheers. gotta go. It's a "work night. " I have to keep the paying customers happy. I'll drop in again as soon as things are a little less hectic at work..... oh, by the way, I'm heading off soon for 10 days of singlehanded cruising in the San Juans... by myself but in the company of friends.... and I can't go unless I get my work done!!!
User avatar
Seapup
Captain
Posts: 943
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:05 am
Location: 2002 26x - Virgina Beach, Va

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by Seapup »

The biggest obstacle to putting a 135-ish sail on the Mac26X is that there aren't any tracks or jib leads in a the right place. I repeat: The shrouds and chainplate locations aren't the big problem. The lack of of tracks is the big problem.

You could conceivably solve the problem with barber haulers. or perhaps with clever track placement. Victor is working on that and Highlander has done some amazing things with his boat, so maybe he has some ideas.
You can attach a twing easily to the chainplates. I have used them there a few years. A quick demo test to try is attach a shackle through the bottom hole in the chainplate, run a line from it up to a caribbeaner on the jib sheet, back down to the shackle and to then to the cockpit. I put 7' tracks on the cockpit combing for better control, but basically run all my headsails this way to ez cleats instead since its easier to adjust while sailing.
Adding sail area at the back will also have an affect on the balance of the helm, (probably not too huge, but that's a WAG, not based on analysis). You may need to alter the mast rake to reduce weather helm, or change the angle of the daggar board when beating to windward.
My 2Cents is balance would be affected largely. I was lucky enough to be able to try a few "used" mains on my :macx: before buying one. I ended up going with a main with a shorter foot but fuller cut. The little change made a huge change in balance. I did not have a balance problem before, but now it will keep going straight all day with no hands on the wheel vs veering off after a bit. I have not noticed the decreased area/power since the better shape sails faster (just my opinion) When its not enough the wind is under 10 and its time for a spinnaker or drifter.

Image
korn_kid_12
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:27 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by korn_kid_12 »

No one else checked out peak sails?
marcopolo173
Deckhand
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 7:40 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Melbourne, Vic, Australia

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by marcopolo173 »

Korn Kid

There are some experiences with Peak Sails in this thread, mine included (which weren't altogether positive).

http://www.macgregorsailors.com/forum/v ... =9&t=24020

Cheers, Marc
User avatar
grady
Captain
Posts: 946
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:38 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26S
Location: Dallas

Re: Replacement Sails

Post by grady »

Speaking of useed sails.

https://www.mastheadsailinggear.com/UsedSailSearch.aspx

Have purchased 2 used headsails and one new main from Masthead sailing gear. The sails were exactly as advertized.
Post Reply