What about the big colorful racing spinnaker with the 6' bow extender that has been in the print for just as long, is it all talk and no action too?Moe wrote:That wording about a channel through the 26M mast has been on the MacGregor website for five years now. Same for the large optional cooler that fits in the aft dinette seat, IIRC.
Mast wiring
- Terry
- Admiral
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 2:35 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada. '03 26M - New Yamaha 70
- Shane
- First Officer
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:06 pm
- Location: Langley, BC ......."Best O' Both"...... '07 26M w/70 hp Suzuki
- Contact:
Rich,
Thanks, that's exactly the type of info I was looking for; factoring in the different antennae gains. Considering how firm they sound on the 5 meter distance, the FCC & manufactures info all seems somewhat vague on these types of specifics.
As I read it, it looks like doubling the power (ie 50 to 100w) increases the safe distance by 1.4 (approx). So at 25w, I get 2.28m (Dividing the 3.2 by 1.4). A 50% duty cycle takes it down to 1.6m. Does that sound in the ballpark to you?
Regards,
Shane
Thanks, that's exactly the type of info I was looking for; factoring in the different antennae gains. Considering how firm they sound on the 5 meter distance, the FCC & manufactures info all seems somewhat vague on these types of specifics.
As I read it, it looks like doubling the power (ie 50 to 100w) increases the safe distance by 1.4 (approx). So at 25w, I get 2.28m (Dividing the 3.2 by 1.4). A 50% duty cycle takes it down to 1.6m. Does that sound in the ballpark to you?
Regards,
Shane
Hamin' X wrote:Shane,
Maybe this chart will help:
Use the 2m/144MHz and assume 50 watts continuous, unc(uncontrolled).
Rich---Hamin' X---N7ZH
- Hamin' X
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:02 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Hermiston, OR-----------2001 26X DF-50 Suz---------------(Now Sold)
- Contact:
Shane,
That's pretty close to correct. Also, most antenna gain figures are wishful thinking. An antenna that is listed as 6 db gain is rarely more than 4. It is important to understand the difference between gain ratings, also. The third letter in the gain units is the important one. db(i) is rating compared to an isotropic (imaginary point source that radiates equally in all directions, spherically). db(d) is comparing to a half-wave dipole, a much more realistic figure. dbd is about 2.15 db less than dbi. If the third letter is missing, assume that the manufacture is rating in dbi, to inflate their gain. Also, a typical 25W VHF marine transceiver is only putting out 18-20 Watts. However, the chart is intended for a worst-case scenario and if you follow it's guide lines, all is well. Another point is, The FCC does not require us (Amateur Radio operators) to do an RF safety evaluation on VHF installations below 50 Watts and all mobile installations are excluded.
Rich---Hamin' X---N7ZH
That's pretty close to correct. Also, most antenna gain figures are wishful thinking. An antenna that is listed as 6 db gain is rarely more than 4. It is important to understand the difference between gain ratings, also. The third letter in the gain units is the important one. db(i) is rating compared to an isotropic (imaginary point source that radiates equally in all directions, spherically). db(d) is comparing to a half-wave dipole, a much more realistic figure. dbd is about 2.15 db less than dbi. If the third letter is missing, assume that the manufacture is rating in dbi, to inflate their gain. Also, a typical 25W VHF marine transceiver is only putting out 18-20 Watts. However, the chart is intended for a worst-case scenario and if you follow it's guide lines, all is well. Another point is, The FCC does not require us (Amateur Radio operators) to do an RF safety evaluation on VHF installations below 50 Watts and all mobile installations are excluded.
Rich---Hamin' X---N7ZH
- Captain Jim
- Engineer
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:16 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Fort Miller, N.Y.; "BOLD VENTURE"; 2006 26M Blue ; 05 Honda 50Hp 4 S
Nice Aft:
Ray,
I am getting ready to purchace a new VHF radio and antenna. I lke the way you have installed yours on NICE AFT, it seems to be a clean and simple solution. Have you experienced any regrets with your antenna mounting arrangement? If so, what would you change? What type of antenna do you have/recommend(3db,6db, etc)? Would appreciate your input or anyone else's from the forum. I only want to do this once. Like measure a whole bunch and cut/drill once.
Fair winds,
Jim
S/V BOLD VENTURE
Ray,
I am getting ready to purchace a new VHF radio and antenna. I lke the way you have installed yours on NICE AFT, it seems to be a clean and simple solution. Have you experienced any regrets with your antenna mounting arrangement? If so, what would you change? What type of antenna do you have/recommend(3db,6db, etc)? Would appreciate your input or anyone else's from the forum. I only want to do this once. Like measure a whole bunch and cut/drill once.
Fair winds,
Jim
S/V BOLD VENTURE
- RickJ
- First Officer
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:39 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 19
- Location: Isle of Wight, UK - '94 19 + Tohatsu MFS30
I looked at the idea of a masthead tri-colour (both the bow and stern nav. lights were broken when I got my boat), but then I realised that the tri-colours were 10W minimum, whereas the Aqua-Signal 20 standard replacements are 5W each. The combined masthead lights are neat, but don't actually save any power over standardCatigale wrote:Just as an FYI this year I am putting a combined Nav light and anchor light on top of Catigales mast - this performs the function of the bow and stern light with a single bulb (one each for cruising and anchoring of course)
Anyway, by the time I'd put a wind transducer and VHF antenna on top of the mast, there was no room for anything else
Cheers, Rick
- RickJ
- First Officer
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:39 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 19
- Location: Isle of Wight, UK - '94 19 + Tohatsu MFS30
Which is OK until you start up the motor - the masthead tri-colour is then invalid, because of the need to show a white steaming light above the red/green lights. So you still need the regular lights at low level when under power!Catigale wrote:Im actually less motivated by power savings, more so by wanting to be more visible.
Do you think nav. lights at the top of the mast actually do make a sailing vessel more visible? I've no opinion on this either way as I've never tried to make objective comparisons.
LEDs rule! The only problem with nav. lights is the LED ones are stupidly expensive. I've been experimenting with replacement LEDs for other lights - the sort that are sold for cars at pretty good prices (esp. on eBay). I've found some good ones for interior lights, a deck light, and also one that works well in a Davis Megalight. But they aren't any good in the Aqua Signal nav. lights.I think it is a 10W rating - LEDS are the way to go to save power of course.
A lot sold for car use only emit usable light end-on, which is fine for the way most car lamps are made. For other purposes you tend to need light all-round, and there are some that have multiple individual LEDs pointing in different directions. These work pretty well, including in the Megalight, but the alignment is wrong for the nav. lights
Cheers, Rick
- Russ
- Admiral
- Posts: 8325
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi
My last boat had a tri-color light on top along with the anchor light. I think we used it maybe once.RickJ wrote:Do you think nav. lights at the top of the mast actually do make a sailing vessel more visible? I've no opinion on this either way as I've never tried to make objective comparisons.
I've got mixed opinions on this.
Surely in any kind of swells, higher lights are superior as lower lights will dip below the swells. However in close up situations, I'm leaning towards lower lights myself. I've been on the water close to another boat and didn't see their mast top tri-color. Well, actually I did, but mistook it for a light on shore or something. It was disorienting because I wasn't looking up there or expecting to see a light up there. This was in calm inter coastal waters. Offshore, the masthead tri-color wins.
Since the primary purpose of nav lights is to avoid collision, I'm now leaning towards good lighting close to eye level.
I'm toying with the idea of a masthead LED anchor light. Besides the fact that LEDs are priced way too high, I'm wondering if a small boat up close to me would be looking up there. With a blue hull at night, I'm probably a pretty dark object and my masthead light might look like a star.
I know of an accident where a Seadoo crashed into the side of a sailboat and went right through. Killed the driver and planted the Seadoo inside the boat.
Now, I'm thinking of a simple D cell battery powered clamp on anchor light that might also illuminate my deck a bit to make me more visible to fast moving boats at night. Shoot, if I had the power, I'd haul Christmas lights up the halyards to make us stick out.
- Catigale
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10421
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:59 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Admiral .............Catigale 2002X.......Lots of Harpoon Hobie 16 Skiffs....Island 17
- Contact:
Thats an oft-missed point Rich, and thanks for reminding me of it.
Correct. Of course, once under power, I have 200 Watts of alternator power, and energy conservation be d****d!!Which is OK until you start up the motor - the masthead tri-colour is then invalid, because of the need to show a white steaming light above the red/green lights. So you still need the regular lights at low level when under power!
- tangentair
- Admiral
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:59 am
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
- Location: Highland Park, IL ...07M...Merc 50 BF...Mila K
I have an 8 foot antenna that I mount to the rear mast support with 2 clamp on mast attachments and a short piece of pipe. Why 2, to correct for the angles of the mast support, one holds the short pipe and compensates for the backward slant and the other clamps on the short pipe and makes up for the inward slant -> cause she didn’t think it "looked nice" with just one.
The issue with the antenna atop the mast when stepping the mast often (or at all) is the connectors, soldering with dissimilar metals, corrosion, regular removal wear (and forgetting or loosing it) when trailering, or leaving it on and adding to the length/breakage opportunity.
As for visibility, when I am in doubt if my “low riding” running lights are being seen, I light up the main with the lantern on wide beam. I also saw a tricolor atop a J boat with milar sails AFTER it went by zipping by me in the dark. Close in I am just not focusing on anything that high
The issue with the antenna atop the mast when stepping the mast often (or at all) is the connectors, soldering with dissimilar metals, corrosion, regular removal wear (and forgetting or loosing it) when trailering, or leaving it on and adding to the length/breakage opportunity.
As for visibility, when I am in doubt if my “low riding” running lights are being seen, I light up the main with the lantern on wide beam. I also saw a tricolor atop a J boat with milar sails AFTER it went by zipping by me in the dark. Close in I am just not focusing on anything that high
