I had a different take on the bridle's effectiveness, which is intended to reduce the hull's tacking against the anchor. When wind is too light, the hull simply won't 'tack' ... no surprise that it takes notable wind velocity to create lift across the freeboard. Prior to that degree of wind, the hull will pull the rode tight and then 'bounce back' against the catenary, slackening the rode.Don T wrote: ... Success or failure of the bridle depends on the amount of energy stored in the rode. If the wind is strong enough and the rode is long enough, when the boat is turned by the rode it will run up on the anchor and slack the rode.
We recently anchored for an afternoon in a well-sheltered cove. With depth about 15 feet, I let out a good 80 feet, using a bridle to the winch. I found the boat wandering aimlessly in light winds ... an adjacent Hunter 40+ was behaving similarly. As soon as afternoon winds kicked up to 12+ mph the hull began to strain at the rode. But the bridle took effect, holding the hull on a single tack (stb tack, bridled to stb winch) in a range of about 45 degrees.
This seems logical ... the hull is effectively heading upwind between close-hauled and irons. By contrast, when anchored at the bow, it seems these hulls want to swing (pretty reliably) from a Stb beam reach to Port beam reach.
Once the wind came up with rode forequartered, the hull could no longer cross the eye of the wind. I don't ever recall the rode going slack once winds are strong enough to induce hull-tacking. The Hunter also steadied as winds came up. I found that just snubbing the rode at the aft pulpit stanchion yielded the same results as a bridle, but I wouldn't want to leave the boat snubbed to the stanchion overnight. YMMV.

