2,000 w/PT 4.8 kts--w/o PT 4.8 kts--w/PT/ballast 4.8kts
2,500 w/PT 6.2 kts--w/o PT 6.1 kts--w/PT/ballast 6.2
3,000 w/PT 7.2 kts--w/o PT 7.1 kts--w/PT/ballast 7.0
3,500 w/PT 8.7 kts--w/o PT 8.3 kts--w/PT/ballast 7.6
4,000 w/PT 10.0 kts--w/o PT 9.7 kts--w/PT/ballast 8.6
4,500 w/PT 12.0 kts--w/o PT 12.0 kts--w/PT/ballast 11.0
5,000 w/PT 14.0 kts--w/o PT 14.0 kts--w/PT/ballast 13.0
5,300 w/PT 15.0 kts--w/o PT 15.0 kts-------N.A--------
The standard OEM 3x9x14" prop = 5,300 rpm. the Hydrus 3x9x14" = 5,150 rpm., no ballast.
The PT was quieter at all rpms however the steering effort seemed heavier. In mid ranges I could tilt the engine up a little to get more rpm at a given throttle set, however I had to tilt max "in" from 4,000 + to get the bow down.
I had toyed with the idea to installing some sort of keel to stabilize the tracking of the
I can't report on fuel economy but I did run 2 hrs at varying speeds on 3 gallons.
Given the bright stainless steel color of the PT I would be concerned about river monster/bull shark encounters as it is one big mother of a flasher.
I would definatly recommend the PT for small proped boats having trouble at the launch ramp/docking. Time will tell about fuel savings.
On another note, if I were to power boat all day, I think the steering would be easier if I pinned one of the rudders "up" as there seems to be alot of tension in the rudder system while hooked to the engine.
Bob
