MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

A forum for discussing topics relating to MacGregor Powersailor Sailboats
User avatar
pitchpolehobie
Captain
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:46 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: USA, OH

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by pitchpolehobie »

I would not fill my ballast underway in bad conditions. Too much Time for water to slosh around. I would get everyone into the lowest centerpoint in the boat salon to increase meat ballast.
2002 MacGregor 26X: Remedium
Tohatsu 25HP
Cruising Area: Inland Ohio, Lake Erie
User avatar
kurz
Admiral
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Zürich, Switzerland, Europe

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by kurz »

Depends on possibilities...
why not put some buckets of sea water in the vent funel.
Or maybe you could use a pump...

OK my :macm: I hase a wooden stick so I do not have to grab down open/close the ballast vent.

Maybe I could open it, and close it when I think water would flow out...
JotaErre
Engineer
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Spain

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by JotaErre »

Russ wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 4:54 pm I fill ballast early in the season and never empty it until the end.
I just don't see the benefit of running sans ballast.

Oh, I guess if you want to eek out more MPH or fuel economy it makes sense. I own a Mac not a Malibu and spend so much on other things, fuel is the least of my expenses.

Bottom line, I check weather and radar before heading out. Make sure all safety systems are ready.
So do I. If the boat is on the water, the ballast tank is full.
Gotro
Engineer
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:25 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Houston Texas
Contact:

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Gotro »

I have a 1995 x and it has two ballast fill valves one on the stern and one on the bottom of the hull . The one under the hull I never use . But if I did need to fill ballast in rough conditions thats the one to use if the waves are up. Do the later model x and The M boats have an under the hull valve?
DaveC426913
Admiral
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:05 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Toronto Canada
Contact:

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by DaveC426913 »

Gotro wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:11 pm ... one on the bottom of the hull . The one under the hull ...
:o
You make it sound like you have a thru-hull...
MacX 2000 Honda BF50A 'SeaSaw'
User avatar
Jimmyt
Admiral
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:52 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Mobile AL 2013 26M, 60 Etec

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Jimmyt »

Gotro wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:11 pm I have a 1995 x and it has two ballast fill valves one on the stern and one on the bottom of the hull . The one under the hull I never use . But if I did need to fill ballast in rough conditions thats the one to use if the waves are up. Do the later model x and The M boats have an under the hull valve?
The M boats do not. They only have a valve on the transom.
Jimmyt
P-Cub-Boo
2013 26M, Etec 60, roller Genoa, roller main
Cruising Waters: Mobile Bay, Western Shore, Fowl River
DaveC426913
Admiral
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:05 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Toronto Canada
Contact:

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by DaveC426913 »

Jimmyt wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 1:45 pm The M boats do not. They only have a valve on the transom.
I know. Same with :macx:

Which makes me wonder to what Gotro is referring.
MacX 2000 Honda BF50A 'SeaSaw'
Gotro
Engineer
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 10:25 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Houston Texas
Contact:

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Gotro »

Here’s a diagram from the 95 manual of the Mac x water valve under the hull
Image
User avatar
NiceAft
Admiral
Posts: 6470
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:28 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Upper Dublin,PA, USA: 2005M 50hp.Honda4strk.,1979 Phantom Sport Sailboat, 9'Achilles 6HP Merc 4strk

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by NiceAft »

If I understand the diagram, the valve is under the hull. Give credit where credit is due.
Ray ~~_/)~~
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Be Free »

The 1996 manual has the same diagram. I knew that the vent was in that spot on the early models but this is the first I realized that the fill valve was under the boat instead of on the transom. You learn something new every day. Thanks.
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
Maraquita
Chief Steward
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:44 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26D
Location: Whitewater, CO

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Maraquita »

that is the ONLY fill valve on the 26D, and I assume on the 26S as well. No way to empty ballast without getting out of the water, or pressurizing the tank. Of course, also no way to get on plane no matter how much HP you hang on the back!
User avatar
Russ
Admiral
Posts: 7890
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Russ »

Very interesting. I never knew the earlier 26X filled from the bottom. Roger must have figured out that it's possible to drain the ballast while under power via the transom.

This configuration seems to be how the earlier 26S/D models operated and he kept that system.

Now I wonder if it's possible to modify an older < 1996 26X to drain out the transom by adding the big 'ol waste valve.




Image
--Russ
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Be Free »

Anything is possible. Back in my "hotrod" days it was a truism that any car could be made to go fast. "All it takes is cubic money."

Glassing in a valve while the boat is under construction is easy. Cutting through the transom, hitting the right spot on the ballast tank, and then getting the whole thing to seal is a whole different problem! It's way beyond my fiberglass skills (or nerve).
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1580
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by Be Free »

Maraquita wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:43 pm that is the ONLY fill valve on the 26D, and I assume on the 26S as well. No way to empty ballast without getting out of the water, or pressurizing the tank. Of course, also no way to get on plane no matter how much HP you hang on the back!
It seems like a good design for a pure sailboat where the ballast is (almost) always needed. How long does it take to fill? The opening appears to be quite small compared to the later "waste valve" design on the X.
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
beechkingd
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 13, 2019 3:41 am
Location: Central VA

Re: MacGregor Sailing Accident - Safety Reminder

Post by beechkingd »

Russ wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:23 pm Very interesting. I never knew the earlier 26X filled from the bottom. Roger must have figured out that it's possible to drain the ballast while under power via the transom.

This configuration seems to be how the earlier 26S/D models operated and he kept that system.

Now I wonder if it's possible to modify an older < 1996 26X to drain out the transom by adding the big 'ol waste valve.




Image
There is a drain on the back, he figured out he could fill it from there as well and eliminated the fill valve on the newer models. Reduced production costs even more.
Post Reply