I never stated anything ambiguous - I stated explicitly what the government regulators and the scientific engineering journals state and can back my statements up with authoritative publications and personal experience. Higher octane fuel is only beneficial for engines requiring fuel that resists pre-detonation to resist knocking (and I own three vehicles that require this fuel). The additive packages in the USA are required by law to be the same across the different octane levels. Do you have authoritative published information to back your claim that running a higher octane in our MacBoats in engines that do not require it is beneficial to anyone other than the oil executives?seahouse wrote:Either A)Interesting - I never asked a question
The question was implied by the apparent ambiguity of the statement, which the answer addresses. The quality of being "good" is imparted to the question by the somewhat arcane nature of the information in the answer. I think there might be others on the forum who are curious about the same topic, particularly since some have experienced engine problems that are low octane related.
Or B)
This is Jeopardy and I should have posed the answer in the form of a question, so that the original statement did not need to be a question at all.![]()
- B.
Too many people think they are doing themselves a favor by buying the more expensive fuel - they are not.
BTW, For those of us in EPA target states, like most of the eastern seaboard of the USA, fuel formulations are highly controlled - we cannot buy ethanol free fuel. My approach, just use it before it gets old. If it is to sit over the winter, add stabilizer. I have not once had a problem starting my ETEC60 after fuel has sat over the winter.
EDIT: there are areas outside of the EPA control zone (such as the eastern shore of Maryland) where ethanol free fuel is available.

It's nearly impossible to get both of those rods in the right place and linked up while trying to re-attach the lower assembly to the upper.