Currently Amsoil and Sierra claim they have cloned the BRP XD-100 but caution E-tec owners to use their product only after the warranty period has ended to avoid any possible warranty litigation. No where do they state "approved for use in E-tec engines" on their labels. The cost of these clone oils are comparable to XD-100 so it doesn't make sense to use them unless in an emergency when XD-100 is unavailable in the neighborhood.
Ron, if an E-tec fails during the warranty period and it is determined that a clone oil was used and BRP refused to warranty the failure, who would you sue? The clone oil manufacturer that advertised "compatible for E-tec use" Or BRP?
BTW, in order to sue BRP the damages must exceed $20,000.
Brian, as you stated, the electronics of the E-tec monitor and control all gas and oil functions giving the E-tec exceptional power, fuel economy and green exhaust in a very small light weight package. To accomplish this BRP developed an oil formula specifically engineered as an integral component that would allow the engine to run cleanly with power @ 80:1 exhausting less pollution than typical 50:1 mixtures. I would think the E-tec detractors on this 4M would appreciate the positive environmental steps BRP has made to reduce our waterway noise and exhaust pollution especially since we, the E-tec owners, have the option to spend our oil money as we choose.
Forum rules will not allow me to honestly answer your last oil question
Bob
